Business Controls
Sarbanes-Oxley/Bill 198 – Is the glass half empty or
half full?
Alec Moore and
Massood Oroomchi
Many
executives look at the recent U.S. and Canadian security
commission compliance rulings (Sarbanes-Oxley in the
U.S. and Bill198 in Canada) as a necessary evil pill
that defocuses executives and their teams from driving
their respective businesses forward. But is it? How can
a company leverage the digestion of this evil compliance
pill into something more palatable? Maybe even do the
unthinkable and turn the exercise into one that creates
customer, shareholder and employee value!
As
background, the Sarbanes-Oxley/Bill 198 rules apply to
all public companies trading on U.S. and Canadian
exchanges. For those trading on U.S. exchanges (Nasdaq,
NYSE), Sarbanes-Oxley rules will apply and for those
trading on Canadian exchanges (TSX, Canadian venture),
Bill 198 rules shall apply. Note that a company
generating business in the U.S. but trading only on the
TSX would be subject to Bill 198 rules only. The content
of both acts focus on documenting and testing internal
and disclosure controls for each business process in the
company. All areas of the business are “tested” from the
accounting transactions to computer systems to overall
corporate governance. While the content of Bill 198 is
consistent with the direction of Sarbanes-Oxley rules,
the language in Bill 198 is relatively softer. However,
we expect that further amendments to Bill 198 over the
near term will bring it more in line with Sarbanes-Oxley
rules.
Get some leverage
Given
the magnitude and importance of this exercise and the
potential conflict with other business priorities of
North American businesses, how can companies leverage
this compliance task? Consider the following…
After
a company has completed the compliance exercise, their
internal controls including corporate governance will
have been strengthened, thereby reducing business risk.
This is a good thing! Also, remember the hype (and
grumbling) around ISO certifications? Suddenly we
started to see ISO banners appearing on buildings. They
have become sales and marketing tools for customers,
shareholders and employees. Could this be the next big
thing for the first wave of Sarbanes-Oxley/Bill 198
compliant companies?
Consider the expense side of your business and what will
happen as you streamline processes and enhance the
underlying infrastructure. The documentation and
enhancement of disclosure and internal controls will
help a business identify opportunities for resource
realignment, outsourcing/ insourcing,
centralizing/decentralizing and process re-engineering.
Improved and more reliable reporting of financials will
provide enhanced management insight into the operations
of the business and more efficient quarterly and annual
financial audit processes.
Furthermore, consider how a solid infrastructure
underlying your business processes will aid your future
growth/expansion plans. Also, a merger or acquisition
and the corresponding integration of two companies will
be more likely to succeed with the compliance exercise
completed.
Priority for IPOs
Any
private companies contemplating an initial public
offering (IPO) should consider the compliance project as
soon as possible. Our discussions with companies moving
down the IPO path suggest that CFOs and other executives
are not fully aware of how Sarbanes-Oxley/Bill 198 rules
will apply to their companies once the IPO process is
complete. In particular, the company will be subject to
the same rules as any other public company with no
additional grace period. On the positive side, however,
even before the commencement of the IPO process, a
company can benefit by employing compliance exercise
tools to improve their internal controls, become more
efficient, increase customer satisfaction, etc. Existing
and potential investors, customers and employees will
see the finished product as a well-managed business,
thereby increasing the intrinsic value of the firm.
Sarbanes-Oxley/Bill 198 compliance rules are, quite
simply, all about doing business in a better way.
Another consideration is to link the timing of the
compliance effort with ongoing or upcoming initiatives
to maximize the potential benefits and minimize costly
re-work. If, for example, a company has decided to
purchase a new financial system, significant effort
would be required to understand and map existing
processes and system requirements. The design and
implementation of this work should be done in
conjunction with Sarbanes-Oxley/Bill 198 compliance
work. This will maximize the cost effectiveness of the
combined initiatives and eliminate potential re-work.
As
SEC Chairman William Donaldson remarked at the National
Press Club in July 2003, “If companies view the new laws
as opportunities – opportunities to improve internal
controls, improve the performance of the board and
improve their public reporting – they will ultimately be
better run, more transparent, and therefore more
attractive to investors.”
Massood Oroomchi and Alec Moore are
partners in FinEx Consulting Group Inc. The company
provides leadership and support to private and public
firms in Sarbanes-Oxley/Bill 198 compliance
implementation. They also provide guidance to companies
in the areas of Mergers and Acquisitions and Business
Planning. For further information, please contact (519)
880-0285 or
HAmoore@sympatico.ca. Alternatively, you may
contact Eric Sundin at (519) 749-9319 x1300.
Email:
eric.sundin@dataperceptions.com |