Strategy
Get a grip on SPAM
By Scott Murphy
They call it SPAM, you call it a total waste of time.
Recent estimates indicate that 63%[1]
of Internet email traffic is considered SPAM and
that the annual cost per employee due to lost
productivity due to SPAM is $1,400[2].
Here's what you can do about it.
It is
the same story for everyone with an email address; you
open your email each day to find 10, 20, 30 or 100
messages from people you don’t know (or care to know for
that matter) on topics you don’t care about. It is
worse if you have a BlackBerry™ or other handheld device as it reduces the great
efficiencies that they once brought. Is there an end in
sight to this productivity drain?
Yes.
Many organizations have developed (anti-)SPAM filtering
solutions that allow your email to be reviewed by a
server (similar to anti-virus software) before it
reaches your inbox. None of the solutions so far are
100% accurate as SPAM writers are always looking for
ways to avoid being caught by SPAM filters. Each vendor
has a slightly different approach to SPAM filtering.
They tend to fall into one of four categories:
1. ASP Model: Your email address is
redirected to a service provider’s server where a
centralized server reviews your email electronically and
determines if the message is SPAM and either blocks the
message or lets it pass through to your inbox. Many
Internet Service Providers (ISP’s) are offering this
type of service. Some services are free and others have
a cost associated.
|
Benefits: |
·
low capital cost
·
ease of implementation |
|
Challenges: |
·
each user needs to login to a web site to verify that none of the
blocked email are actually valid messages |
|
Effectiveness |
·
Poor to fair – more clutter due to lack of integration with users’
mailbox |
2.
Gateway Model: As your email enters your
office network it passes through a corporately owned
server that acts as an email gateway. The server
reviews each email and assigns it a SPAM rating. All
email continues to your corporate email server where
each user can create a rule that will filter emails into
other folders (such as Deleted Items or Junk E-mail)
based on the SPAM rating.
|
Benefits: |
·
does not affect the performance of your email server
·
all messages arrive at the email server and are easily filtered for
later review |
|
Challenges: |
·
user needs to have rules maintained that filter the messages from
their Inbox
·
filtering often does not happen before the message is relayed to
remote devices such as a BlackBerry™. |
|
Effectiveness |
·
Usually moderate with little integration with users’ mailbox |
3. Integrated Model: Your email (including
SPAM) arrives at your corporate email server where a
program intercepts the email before it gets to your
email box. All messages are reviewed electronically and
based on rules based on a SPAM rating (typically set
globally on the server) either places the message
directly into your Inbox, directly into your Junk E-mail
folder or deletes them entirely.
|
Benefits: |
·
filtering is tightly integrated with the email box
·
ease of use and administration
·
intercepts the message before it is forwarded to the remote device |
|
Challenges: |
·
negatively affects the performance of your email server |
|
Effectiveness |
·
Poor to very good, depending on filtering method(s) |
4. Desktop Model: Your email arrives at
your desktop as usual, however as it enters your Inbox a
local program reviews the message and determines if it
is SPAM based on your individual settings and filters it
into the appropriate folder.
|
Benefits: |
·
rules are unique to the user |
|
Challenges: |
·
user needs to have rules maintained that filter the messages from
their Inbox
·
filtering often does not happen before the message is relayed to
remote devices such as a BlackBerry™. |
|
Effectiveness |
·
Poor to good, depending on filtering method(s) |
All
of these solutions are better than having no solution at
all, however if you are looking for a solution for your
office, there are various filtering techniques that
should be considered when selecting an effective
solution. One of the best filtering methods is called
a Bayesian Filtering. A few solutions are starting to
integrate this method, although mostly those in the
Integrated Model category. This method analyzes your
specific trends for sending, reading, and deleting email
messages (both corporately and at the individual user
level) and builds a customized SPAM filtering scheme for
each user. This method is extremely effective in
reducing the number of false positives (messages flagged
as SPAM that should not have been) while keeping the
number of SPAM messages that arrive in your Inbox to a
minimum.
There
are some future new IEEE standards being developed for
email but these techniques are in testing and waiting
for IEEE acceptance and industry adoption.
Email
is consuming an increasingly large portion of corporate
users’ time. Keep this time to a minimum, improve
productivity and your network security by implementing
an (anti-) SPAM filtering solution for your corporate
email.
Scott
Murphy is a Consultant at Data Perceptions. Scott helps companies select best
available technologies to meet their business
requirements. Scott’s education, IT and business
experience allow him to understand clients’ needs and
translate them into solutions.
[1]
Sick of SPAM, Network Computing, 5.13.2004
[2] Sick
of SPAM, Network Computing, 5.13.2004
|